In collaboration Iranian Hydraulic Association

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Materials and Energy Research Center, Dez.C., Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad branch, Khorramabad, Iran

3 PhD in Water Sciences and Engineering, PhD in Water Sciences and Engineering, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Lorestan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran

10.22077/jaaq.2025.10220.1131

Abstract

Accurate estimation of groundwater salinity in the coastal areas of the Caspian Sea is of great importance due to challenges such as saltwater intrusion and spatiotemporal complexity. In this study, hybrid models based on support vector regression (SVR) combined with advanced optimization algorithms, including wavelet transform, algorithm of innovative gunner (AIG), and particle swarm optimization (PSO), were used to predict groundwater salinity in the coastal region of the Caspian Sea. The data included water quality parameters such as bicarbonate (HCO₃), sodium (Na), total hardness (TH), total dissolved solids (TDS), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), pH, and calcium (Ca) as inputs, and electrical conductivity (EC) as the output parameter. The data were collected from monitoring wells in the region over a period from 2003 to 2023, using eight combined scenarios. To evaluate the performance of the models, correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) were used. The results showed that combined scenarios in the studied models improved their performance. The evaluation metrics also indicated that the support vector regression-wavelet (SVR-Wavelet) model achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.985, RMSE of 0.206 dS/m, MAE of 0.105 dS/m, and NSE of 0.990 in the validation phase. Sensitivity analysis revealed that TDS and total hardness (TH) had the most significant impact on the prediction accuracy of the models. This study confirms the effectiveness of hybrid approaches, particularly the combination of SVR with the cultural algorithm, for sustainable management of groundwater resources in coastal areas.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Anderson, L., Miller, J., Davis, K. (2022). A novel SVR-GA hybrid framework for predicting groundwater salinity dynamics in coastal aquifers. Journal of Hydrology, 615, 128567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128567
Asadi, E., Isazadeh, M., Samadianfard, S., Ramli, M.F., Mosavi, A., Nabipour, N., Shamshirband, S., Hajnal, E., Chau, K.W. (2020). Groundwater Quality Assessment for Sustainable Drinking and Irrigation. Sustainability, 12, 177 190.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010177
Babaali, H.R., Nohani, E., Dehghani, R.(2024).Assessment of Groundwater Hardness in Khorramabad Plain Using Hybrid Models Based on Metaheuristic Algorithms. Journal of Aquifer and Qanat, 5(1),125-138. 10.22077/jaaq.2025.8579.1083 .(In Persian)
Basak, D., Pal, S., and Patranabis, D.C.(2007). Support vector regression. Neural Inf Process. 11(2), 203-225.10.12691/jgg-2-3-9
Boluda-Botella, N., Gomis-Yagües, V., Ruiz-Beviá, F. (2008). Influence of transport parameters and chemical properties of the sediment in experiments to measure reactive transport in seawater intrusion. Journal of Hydrology, 357, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.021
Chen, X., & Zhang, H. (2021). Estimating groundwater salinity using a hybrid SVR-PSO model in the North China Plain. Environmental Modelling & Software, 145, 105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105198
Crestani, E., Camporese, M., Salandin, P. (2019). Technical note: an alternative approach to laboratory benchmarking of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,12(3), 1–18.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-127
Dehghani, R., Chamanpira, R. (2025).Metaheuristic-optimized SVR models for daily streamflow forecasting in the Karkheh River Basin, Iran.Desalination and Water Treatment, 324, 446-457.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2025.101446
Eberhart R., Kennedy J. (1995). A New Optimizer Using Particle Swarm Theory Proc. Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center, 6, 39-43.10.1109/MHS.1995.494215
Ibrahim, H., Yaseen, Z.M., Scholz, M., Ali, M., Gad, M., Elsayed, S., Khadr, M., Hussein, H., Ibrahim, H.H., Eid, M.H. (2023). Evaluation and Prediction of Groundwater Quality for Irrigation Using an Integrated Water Quality Indices, Machine Learning Models, and GIS Approaches: A Representative Case Study. Water, 15, 694-712. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040694
Jalalkamali, A., JalalKamali, N. (2018). Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System-Genetic Algorithm Models for Prediction of Groundwater Quality Indices: a GIS-based Analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Data Mining, 6(2), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.22044/jadm.2017.1086
Kisi, O., Karahan, M., Sen, Z. (2006). River suspended sediment modeling using a fuzzy logic approach. Hydrological Processes, 20(2), 4351-4362.10.1002/hyp.6166
Nagy, H., Watanabe, K., Hirano, M. (2002). Prediction of sediment load concentration in rivers using an artificial neural network model. Journal of Hydraulics Engineering, 128, 558-559. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:6(588).
Nohani, E., Babaali, H.R., Dehghani, R.(2024).Evaluation of metaheuristic models in groundwater level analysis of Delfan Plain, Lorestan. Journal of Aquifer and Qanat, 5(2),79-98. 10.22077/jaaq.2025.8834.1096.(In Persian)
Nohani, E., Babaali, H.R., Dehghani, R.(2025).The Impact of Climate Change Parameters on Groundwater Level Decline (Case Study: Kuhdasht-Lorestan). Journal of Aquifer and Qanat, 6(1),87-106. 10.22077/jaaq.2025.9841.1119.(In Persian)
Norouzi Khatiri, K., Nematollahi, B., Hafeziyeh, S., Niksokhan, M.H., Nikoo, M.R., Al-Rawas, G. (2023).Groundwater Management and Allocation Models: A Review. Water, 15, 253-270.https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020253.
Pijarski, P., & Kacejko, P. (2019). A new metaheuristic optimization method: the algorithm of the innovative gunner (AIG). Engineering Optimization, 51(12), 2049-2068.10.1080/0305215X.2019.1565282
Rajaee, T., Ebrahimi, H., Nourani, V. (2019). A review of the artificial intelligence methods in groundwater level modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 572, 336–351.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.037.
Rajaee, T., Khani, S., Ravansalar, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based single and hybrid models for prediction of water quality in rivers: A review.Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 200(3), 1039-1055.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.103978
Robinson, G., Moutari, S., Ahmed, A.A., Hamill, G.A. (2018). An advanced calibration method for image analysis in laboratory-scale seawater intrusion problems. Water Resources Management, 32, 3087–3102.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1977-6
Roy, D.K., Sarkar, T.K., Munmun, T.H. (2025). A review on the applications of machine learning and deep learning to groundwater salinity modeling: present status, challenges, and future directions. Discover Water 5, 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-025-00207-z
Shin, S., Kyung, D., Lee, S., Taik, & Kim, J., Hyun, J. (2005). An application of support vector machines in a bankruptcy prediction model. Expert Systems with Applications, 28(4), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.009
Shrivatava, M., Prasad, V., Khare, R.(2015). Multi-objective optimization of water distribution system using particle swarm optimization. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 12(1), 21–28. 10.9790/1684-12612128
Smith, A., Johnson, M., & Yılmaz, E. (2020). Evaluation of hybrid support vector regression-grey wolf optimizer algorithm for river salinity estimation: A case study on the Johns River, Turkey. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 235, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103715
Vapnik, V., Chervonenkis, A.1991. The necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency in the empirical risk minimization method. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 1(3), 283-305.10.12691/jgg-2-3-9
Vapnik, V.N. (1995). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York, 6(4), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1
Vapnik, V.N. (1998). Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York.7(1), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1
Wang, D., Safavi, A.A., and Romagnoli, J.A.(2000). Wavelet-based adaptive robust M-estimator for non-linear system identification. AIChE Journal, 46(4), 1607-1615. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690460812
Yadav, B., Mathur, S., Ch, S., Yadav, B.K. (2018). Data-based modelling approach for variable density flow and solute transport simulation in a coastal aquifer. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63, 210–226.https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1413491
Yamamoto, T., & Kuroki, S. (2023). A comparative analysis of bio-inspired optimization algorithms (AEO, GWO, COA) for tuning SVR parameters in groundwater salinity prediction. Agricultural Water Management, 284, 108333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108333
Yousefi, S., Avand, M., Yariyan, P., Pourghasemi, H.R., Keesstra, S., Tavangar, S., Tabibian, S. (2020). A novel GIS-based ensemble technique for rangeland downward trend mapping as an ecological indicator of change. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106591.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106591
Yu, X., Xin, P., Lu, C. (2019). Seawater intrusion and retreat in tidally-affected unconfined aquifers: Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations. Advances in Water Resources, 132, 103393.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103393
Zeidalinejad, N., Dehghani, R.(2023). Use of meta-heuristic approach in the estimation of the aquifer's response to climate change under shared socioeconomic pathways. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 20(4), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100882